International Journal of Drug Delivery Technology
Volume 16, Issue 1

The Effect of Surgical Position on Pain Occurrence Outside the Surgical Area

Ruben Timothy Abednego1, Prihatma Kriswidyatomo2,3, Herdiani Sulistyo Putri2,3

1Study Program of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia.
2Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia.
3Department of Anesthesia, Universitas Airlangga Academic Hospital, Indonesia.

Received: 19th Aug, 2025; Revised: 28th Oct 2025; Accepted: 16th Nov, 2025; Available Online: 1st December, 2025

ABSTRACT

Background: Postoperative pain outside the surgical area is often overlooked but can affect patient recovery. Intraoperative positioning causes uneven pressure distribution, tissue compression, and nerve strain that trigger pain at non-surgical sites. This study evaluated the effect of surgical position on postoperative pain characteristics and consistency of findings across subpopulations. Objective: To compare pain occurrence, location count, and intensity across three surgical positions in the first 24 hours postoperatively. Methods: Observational cross-sectional study of 340 adult elective surgery patients (duration ≥2 hours): supine n=187, lateral n=119, prone n=34. Pain assessment at 6, 12, 18, 24 hours using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and 20-location anatomical map. Analyses included Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U with Bonferroni correction (α=0.017), and stratified multiple regression by anesthesia type: general anesthesia with intubation (n=191), general anesthesia with LMA (n=74), regional anesthesia SAB (n=75). Dependent variable was pain location count at 24 hours; independent variables were surgical position, BMI, operation duration. Results: Pain location count differed significantly between positions at all timepoints (H=256.949-257.875, df=2, p0.001). Median lateral and prone were 12-15 locations at 6-12 hours and 12 locations at 18-24 hours, significantly higher than supine (5 locations at 6-12 hours, 1-3 locations at 18-24 hours). Post-hoc: supine vs lateral U=0.0-1.0, p0.001; supine vs prone U=0.0, p0.001; lateral vs prone U=1980.5, p=0.846. Pain intensity differed significantly (H=177.223, df=2, p.001) with median NRS lateral 4.41-7.41, supine 2.51-5.51, prone 2.39-5.39. Stratified regression analysis showed remarkable consistency: lateral coefficients in GA intubation B=10.698 95% CI: 10.379-11.016, p0.001, R²=0.949, GA LMA B=10.565 95% CI: 9.896-11.233, p0.001, R²=0.933, RA SAB B=10.688 95% CI: 10.159-11.217, p0.001, R²=0.969. Coefficient range only 0.133 (1.26% variation), indicating universal effect not modified by anesthesia type. Prone in GA intubation: B=10.840 (p0.001). All confounders p>0.05, VIF 1.5. At 24 hours, 23.5% supine patients were pain-free versus 0% lateral and prone. Conclusion: Surgical position significantly affects postoperative pain. Lateral produces highest burden (12-15 locations, NRS 4.41-7.41), supine lowest (1-5 locations, NRS 2.51-5.51), prone intermediate (12-15 locations, NRS 2.39-5.39). Stratified analysis showed lateral coefficient consistency 1.3% across three anesthesia groups, indicating universal effect and strengthening causal inference. Position is the dominant predictor with non-significant confounders. Findings support universal positioning optimization strategies, especially for lateral position.

Keywords: Surgical positioning, Postoperative pain, Pressure injury, Perioperative care

How to cite this article: Abednego RT, Kriswidyatomo P, Putri HS., The Effect of Surgical Position on Pain Occurrence Outside the Surgical Area. Int J Drug Deliv Technol. 2026;16(1): 199-209. DOI: 10.25258/ijddt.16.1.21