International Journal of Drug Delivery Technology
Volume 16, Issue 8s, 2026

Comparative In Vivo Photobiostimulation Analysis For Periodontal Healing Outcomes In Rajasthan

1* Dr. Pawan Parihar, 2 Dr. Jitender Sharma, 3 Dr. Sweta Soni, 4 Dr. Pravesh Gautam, 5 Dr. Rushikesh Phunde, 6 Dr. Saumya Mishra

1*3rd year Post graduate in the Department of Periodontology and Implantology, Vyas Dental College, Jodhpur (Raj). Email: drpawan.mandeep@gmail.com

2Professor and Head of Department of Periodontology and Implantology, Vyas Dental College, Jodhpur (Raj). Email: jeetusharma2@yahoo.com

3Professor in the Department of Periodontics And Implantology, Vyas Dental College, Jodhpur (Raj). Email: swetasonidr@gmail.com

4MDS in Periodontics And Implantology, Jodhpur (Raj). Email: dr.gautam165@gmail.com

52nd year Post graduate in the Department of Periodontics And Implantology, Vyas Dental College and Hospital, Jodhpur (Raj). Email: rushikeshphunde41@gmail.com

61st year Post graduate Department of Periodontics And Implantology, Vyas Dental College and Hospital, Jodhpur (Raj). Email: academywings42@gmail.com

*Corresponding Author: Dr. Pawan Parihar (MDS in Periodontology & Implantology)

ABSTRACT

PBM enhances non-surgical periodontal therapy outcomes, yet optimal wavelength remains undetermined. Thus in this study we have compared blue (405-460 nm) versus red (660 nm) PBM efficacy as SRP adjunct for maxillary stage II/III periodontitis for 5 patients in quadrant 1 & 2 each respectively with baseline PD 6.0 mm, CAL 2.0 mm, BOP 85% received full-mouth SRP followed by PBM (5-10 J/cm², days 0,1,3,7 and outcomes (PD, CAL, BOP) were assessed at weeks 1,2,4,8,12 using UNC-15 probe. We have found that, blue PBM achieved superior healing over red PBM due to PD reduction was 2.1±0.6 mm vs 1.6±0.7 mm (p=0.03), CAL gain was 0.6±0.3 mm vs 0.4±0.3 mm (p=0.12) and BOP reduction was 67±12% vs 53±13% (p=0.02) at week 12. Thus, showed statistically significant difference as the p value was <0.001, intervention (PD F=6.2 p=0.03; BOP F=9.3 p=0.01), interaction effects (PD F=2.8 p=0.03; BOP F=3.1 p=0.02). effect sizes: PD d=0.78 (large) and BOP d=1.08 (very large) respectively. Thus, we come to conclude that, Blue PBM (405-460 nm) demonstrates accelerated anti-inflammatory kinetics and superior pocket closure (31% greater) versus red PBM as SRP adjunct for maxillary periodontitis, crossing clinical health thresholds (PD<4 mm, BOP<20%). Furthermore, studies are required to validate the results of our study.

Keywords: Blue PBM, PD, BOP, CAL, Red.

How to cite this article: Parihar P, Sharma J, Soni S, Gautam P, Phunde R, Mishra S. Comparative In Vivo Photobiostimulation Analysis For Periodontal Healing Outcomes In Rajasthan. Int J Drug Deliv Technol. 2026;16(8s): 838-844; DOI: 10.25258/ijddt.16.8s.93

Source of support: Nil.

Conflict of interest: None